<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Characterization tools and techniques &#8211; engaging with manufacturers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://characterizationmatters.org/2009/03/13/characterization-tools-and-techniques-engaging-with-manufacturers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://characterizationmatters.org/2009/03/13/characterization-tools-and-techniques-engaging-with-manufacturers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:15:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary Roby</title>
		<link>http://characterizationmatters.org/2009/03/13/characterization-tools-and-techniques-engaging-with-manufacturers/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Roby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://characterizationmatters.org/?p=258#comment-194</guid>
		<description>I agree that information exchange between all parties - academic, manufacturer, government, corporate - is an important option for this website.  Like many others I am also a little cynical about the &quot;real&quot; intentions of postings like those from Bob (by the way, I personally think his is well-intentioned), because of the long history of whitewash and hidden agendas in the guise of FYI&#039;s.

Because of the importance of ensuring that the information is objective and not part of some hidden agenda, I would suggest that blogs like those from Bob - involving products, communications from businesses, etc - have their own response section specifically for businesses and their employees/representatives.  Then readers will at least be alerted to the possibility of other agendas and research the information appropriately.  You may also reserve the right to move a category to the business section if it appears to be more than just information exchange.

While not a perfect solution it will give another way for people posting and people reading to review the postings in the appropriate way.

Kudos to your efforts and to all those involved.

Gary Roby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that information exchange between all parties &#8211; academic, manufacturer, government, corporate &#8211; is an important option for this website.  Like many others I am also a little cynical about the &#8220;real&#8221; intentions of postings like those from Bob (by the way, I personally think his is well-intentioned), because of the long history of whitewash and hidden agendas in the guise of FYI&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Because of the importance of ensuring that the information is objective and not part of some hidden agenda, I would suggest that blogs like those from Bob &#8211; involving products, communications from businesses, etc &#8211; have their own response section specifically for businesses and their employees/representatives.  Then readers will at least be alerted to the possibility of other agendas and research the information appropriately.  You may also reserve the right to move a category to the business section if it appears to be more than just information exchange.</p>
<p>While not a perfect solution it will give another way for people posting and people reading to review the postings in the appropriate way.</p>
<p>Kudos to your efforts and to all those involved.</p>
<p>Gary Roby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glynn Skerratt</title>
		<link>http://characterizationmatters.org/2009/03/13/characterization-tools-and-techniques-engaging-with-manufacturers/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Glynn Skerratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://characterizationmatters.org/?p=258#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Good idea - gets my vote.  My own angle on this would be learning of improvements in instrumentation for workplace monitoring and OHS aspects - particularly portable units.

Best

Glynn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea &#8211; gets my vote.  My own angle on this would be learning of improvements in instrumentation for workplace monitoring and OHS aspects &#8211; particularly portable units.</p>
<p>Best</p>
<p>Glynn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
